★ News flash: The truth never takes a day off ★

US Congress Rejects Constitutional Amendment to Restrict Supreme Court Size

A proposed constitutional amendment to restrict the size of the US Supreme Court has been rejected in Congress, with Republican Mike Johnson accusing Democrats of voting against defending the court's integrity, according to Al Jazeera.

Key facts

  • The US Congress rejected a constitutional amendment to restrict the size of the Supreme Court, according to Al Jazeera.
  • Republican Mike Johnson criticised Democrats over the vote.
  • Johnson said the measure was about 'defending the integrity' of the court.
  • The vote was reported on 3 September 2026, according to Al Jazeera.

The US Congress has rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have restricted the size of the Supreme Court, according to Al Jazeera.

Republican Mike Johnson criticised Democrats following the vote, saying they had voted against ‘defending the integrity’ of the court, as reported by Al Jazeera.

The outcome means the effort to enshrine a limit on the number of justices through a constitutional amendment did not advance. No further details on the vote count or the specific provisions of the amendment were provided in the source.

Why it matters

The size and structure of the Supreme Court shape the balance of power in the US government and the direction of major legal decisions. The rejection of an amendment to restrict the court's size, as reported by Al Jazeera, leaves existing arrangements in place.

Frequently asked questions

What did Congress reject?

According to Al Jazeera, Congress rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have restricted the size of the US Supreme Court.

How did Mike Johnson respond?

Republican Mike Johnson criticised Democrats for voting against 'defending the integrity' of the court, according to Al Jazeera.

When did this happen?

The vote was reported by Al Jazeera on September 3, 2026.

Sources

ⓘ This article was generated with AI assistance, checked against the listed sources, and cleared by an independent AI editorial review.

Get stories like this every morning

One free email. Five minutes. Personalised to your interests.